nav-left cat-right
cat-right

Keeping Cool In The Dog Days of Summer...

The City Manager’s Office tends to get a wide range of phone calls from people looking for stuff to do.  This week, with the heat index rising, we’ve been getting calls from people looking for places to swim.  The staff put together a quick list that I thought was worth sharing, and if you have your own favorite swimming holes please add to the list.  Thanks.


Places To Swim

Theodore Roosevelt High School
1400 N. Mantua St.
Pool Phone: 330-676-8760

http://www.kent.k12.oh.us/rhs/pool/

The above address has information about hours, swim lessons, scuba lessons, etc. This pool is free to public, but has restricted hours.

Kent State University
Student Recreation and Wellness Center

Ted Boyd Drive
Mindi McBride-Aquatics Coordinator 330-672-0480

http://www.recservices.kent.edu/Aquatics/Aquatics%20Home.asp

The above site is for the Aquatic portion of the Wellness Center. From that site there are links that can be refered to for pricing and hours.

Munroe Falls Metro Park
521 S. River Rd., Munroe Falls
330-867-5511 for more info

http://www.summitmetroparks.org/swim_passes/

This site contains information about hours, fees, and swim passes.

Water Works Family Aquatic Fun Center
2025 Munroe Falls Avenue, Cuyahoga Falls

Info Line: 330-971-8299

http://cfo.cityofcf.com/website/web2/view.do?dir=parksandrec/wwfac

The above site indicates amenities, prices, and hours.

Hope this helps!

Promoting Kent...

In this day and age when everyone is trying to be more “buzz-worthy” than the next guy, it’s hard to get noticed with all the buzzing going on. I don’t happen to subscribe to the theory that any press is good press, I just want the good stuff thanks, but I do recognize the power of using advertising to influence perceptions — and in the public realm, perception is reality, so we better be paying attention to the impressions we leave on people as a city. To be honest, one of the things that drives me nuts about my profession is how little advertising we do. I’m not saying we should be spending $1 million in public dollars for a 30 second spot during the Super Bowl, but we darn well better be celebrating our successes, showcasing our product, and emotionally connecting with our citizens or we’re not doing our job as well as we could.

Traditionally, advertising was just for the private sector but today the lines are blurred and what I call a citizen also happens to be a consumer, so guess what, those customer-citizens expect their city to show them the value of their tax dollars, to pitch the product they’re buying.

But for whatever reasons, cities rarely do that.  I’m all for humility but a very successful CEO once said that “you have to be able to toot your own horn without blowing it to succeed.”  I think what he meant was part of the role of leadership is about accentuating the positive, being enthusiastic about the future, and rallying people for a good cause.  That’s just a different form of what otherwise sounds to me a lot like advertising.

I have to be honest, I always get worked up when I see commercials that show a family safe in their home, or kids playing in a local park, or skateboarders cruising the sidewalks, or seniors out for a summer evening walk — (I could go on and on) — and some private company is using our products (the park, the sidewalk, the downtown, etc.) to sell their product.

Come on, it’s not the Nike shoe that makes the experience of jogging though the park great, it’s the great park that makes it great — and we, the city, are the one’s that supply the great park, yet we never bother to tell people. Again, I’m not promoting false advertising — we don’t want to make stuff up — but likewise if we don’t talk up all the good things the city does, how can we expect others to feel good about the city.

Word of mouth, or buzz marketing, really sounds like what my grandparents called gossip. But in this case, we want to use the power of gossip for good not evil.


Cities need to be in the mix competing for attention too. If you’re wondering what that might look like, here’s a few ways of putting city services in a different perspective:

House fire…heart attack…car accident…cat in the tree.
It doesn’t matter what the call is — your firemen and women race from the station and arrive on-the-scene of 14 emergency calls everyday in less time than it takes to brew a cup of coffee. They’re fast – and that’s good — because one of those calls may be for someone you love.

The call of duty.
Last year 42,000 people died in the United States in car accidents. Your police patrol officers are on-duty 24-7 and respond to 10 traffic accident calls everyday to do whatever they can to keep your streets safe and to make sure you never end up a statistic.

Ready when it counts.
Every couple of days your police K9 dogs are sent in to search, rescue and when necessary — catch criminals. In those times we are all reminded why they are considered man’s best friend.

Green means go. Red means stop.
With 500 miles of striping, 400 traffic signs and 2,400 signal bulbs working at 85 signalized intersections around the clock, city traffic crews are always on-call to respond to any problem in order to ensure that nothing jeopardizes the safety of motorists or pedestrians.

Kent … where green thumbs abound.
For 18 straight years Kent has been awarded the Tree City USA distinction for its top-notch tree care program. Each year city crews add nearly 200 trees and shrubs to make the expanding city landscape a brighter shade of green.

Clean living starts with clean streets.
Your street sweeping crews work before and after dawn to sweep trash and litter that gets tossed in our streets.

Behind the scenes.
Fresh cut grass, homerun fences, and soccer goals don’t just happen. Your recreation employees are busy working long before the first pitch to make sure that every game can go extra innings.

Fall and those wonderful leaves.
For every burnt orange leaf on the tree there is another brown leaf on the ground waiting to be raked away. The city crews collected vacuums 13,000 cubic yards of leaves every year – that’s the equivalent of 78,000 bags of leaves.

You get the idea.


Fortunately, the Kent Chamber has made promoting Kent on behalf of the business community a core function, and quite frankly we all benefit from their hard work.  Here’s a few examples of some more traditional advertising outlets that the Chamber uses:

For just the 2nd time in history, the Chamber put together a series of television ads that ran 130 times in a 2 week period.

TV Ad

TVad2

TVad3

TVad4

TVad5

TVad6

The Chamber sponsored a Kent Expo in May that showcased the best Kent has to offer.

The Chamber put together a special Kent Community insert into the Record Courier.

The Chamber published 20,000 Kent visitor’s guides.


It’s a bit ironic that during these times when we consider ourselves the most technically advanced society going, our mouths are still the most effective means of spreading good news.  Put yours to good use, and buzz about Kent.

More on Main Street Kent...

Two weeks ago the Main Street Kent volunteers came to City Council to present their progress after 6 months of existence.  I had already done a blog post (July 11) listing what I knew they were working on and praising them for the enthusiasm they were inspiring in downtown Kent, but after their presentation I realized that my original praises sold them short.  Main Street Kent is the real deal.  Those volunteers have strapped downtown Kent on their back and are climbing that hill of progress.  One of the things I learned in their presentation is that they now have their own web site.  I know, anybody can get a web site, but frankly this site has a lot of great information. Are you looking for vacant space downtown?  Looking for something to do downtown? It’s all there, listed on the Main Street site.

www.mainstreetkent.org

So be sure to add Main Street Kent to your favorites.

It Looks Like Rain...

As a mountain biker this has been a terrific summer to ride the trails, they’ve been very dry and fast.  But as a City Manager I did start to worry about the impact of the below normal rainfall on our water supply since water restrictions are never a good thing.  As is often the case however, the City’s water plant staff have planned for these sorts of contingencies and have taken steps to keep the taps flowing even under near draught conditions.  My job is to worry about these sorts of things, but it sure is nice to find out that thanks to the water plant staff, the City’s water supply is in good hands.


Last week I asked the water plant manager if I should be worrying about the low levels of rainfall and our water supply.  Here’s his reply:

“Dave,

We took some running and static levels this morning as we do every Monday. Our levels have been average for this time of year because we have been using artificial recharge in non-peak hours. Our main monitor well or old production well #9 had a static level of 21.5 feet. This compares to a level that was down 28.8 feet at this time last year.

Number 10 well had a static level this morning of 22.3 feet, which is also excellent. Number 11 well had a running level of 39.7 feet, which is normal. Number 12 well had a static level of 27.6 feet which is better than the 30 foot static level of a year ago. The only well level that is down is #13 because it is a rock well with no artificial recharge. It had a running level today of 107 feet compared with just over 100 feet at this time last year.”



I followed-up by asking what well levels should keep me up at night worrying, and again here’s Steve’s response:

“Dave,

We are very concerned when static levels at #9 well approach 35′. In September of 2000 the static level of #9 well was 38.5′. We were holding our breath. We are actively looking for a secondary water source. Right now I have Ohio Drilling looking at records for the “original” Plum Creek wellfield which was in the park to the southeast of the old water plant and dates back to the 1870′s.

I’m in touch with Floyd-Brown and Associates about a study they did in the early 1960′s about a water source in Fred Fuller Park, by the ballfields. We have also looked into reopening a couple wells in the old wellfield at 1220 Mogadore Rd. This is not too promising though because we don’t have the 300′ sanitary radius now required by the EPA. Gene and I will keep you informed.”


As a former manager of a surface water (river water) plant in Tennesee, I was not as familiar with the science of well field management, but based on Steve’s comments, the use of recharge basins are critical to keeping water levels up in low flow conditions.  Here was Steve’s comments on how the recharge basins work:

“Dave,

We have a huge basin built next the wells. It has a porous gravel bottom so that when it is filled with water, it provides recharge for the wells as water perculates into the water table. The basin is filled by pumping water from the adjacent Breakneck Creek into the basin. I’ll send you a couple of pictures interoffice.”


So raise your water cup and toast to Steve and all the employees in the City’s water department for worrying on our behalf so all we have to do is enjoy the fruits of their labor.

Great work.

Kent Social Service Funding...

There’s a lot of ways to distinguish yourself as a community, and Kent has done just that with it’s consistent support for social service funding.  Helping people in need is a hallmark of Kent’s social services that few communities match.  I’ve heard people say Kent is a city with a conscience, and when you spend $100,000 a year to support social service funding needs, I’d say we’ve earned that title.  Even when funds are tight, Kent still manages to make sure no one gets left behind.  Here’s a list of where the social service dollars are being spent in 2007.

The Community Development Department monitors these projects and reviews whether the program goals are met at the end of each year.  As you can see, there’s never enough dollars to meet all of Kent’s needs, but it’s a credit to City Council, City staff and the service agencies how much good gets done on very tight budgets.

Expanding Resources for Better Neighborhoods...

One of Kent’s challenges is sustaining quality neighborhoods with a comparably older housing stock and a high percentage of rental.  The thing is, time keeps marching forward, so aging housing is a problem every city will eventually deal with (it’s not just a Kent problem).  The question is how will we respond to the challenge.  If you look closely at the older houses along West Main Street you see what’s possible when older houses receive a little TLC.  I know families that have moved out of Kent’s new housing tracts just so they could have a chance to restore one of these timeless beauties.  Not everyone is as motivated as these folks, so the property investment “safety net” are the inspectors we have on staff that educate, inform and, when necessary, enforce city codes that relate to property maintenance.  It’s a thankless job but these are the staff that are on the front lines of fighting blight.


Blight is contagious, and it will creep through good neighborhoods and turn them bad.  But so is reinvestment and when a couple of residents start, it’s usually not long before others follow.  Admittedly, it’s harder when the property owners don’t live in the property to see what their neighbors (or their tenants) are doing and that’s usually how the city ends up getting involved.

For years, the city has managed code enforcement on a complaint basis.  I’ve worked in other cities and that’s a fairly common approach.  It keeps the focus mostly on the “worst offenders” and it keeps code enforcement more of a low profile function, with less government intervention  — aka less of “big brother” watching or bothering you.

The downside to this approach is that it is reactionary which means you’re always trying to catch up to the problems that are already out there.  If the problem wasn’t so contagious I’d say chasing it is a reasonable tactic to take, but the trouble is, when you chase blight, by the time you catch it, it’s had a chance to infect other properties.

So while the complaint approach may lessen the likelihood that you’ll ever be visited by a code enforcement officer, I’m not really sure we’re doing you any favors, because in the meantime blight is spreading ever closer to your home and by the time we knock on your door it could be too late.

You may recall that “Neighborhood Enrichment” has been a buzz word at city hall this year and code enforcement plays a critical role.  We’ve talked a lot about how we do the code functions, what’s working and what’s not, and how we can make a bigger impact in the neighborhoods.  We’re busy recruiting neighbors to form neighborhood councils.  We’re organizing clean up teams.  We’re planning neighborhood events and we’re out talking to neighborhood groups.

The goal is to restore the sense of neighborhood in order to inspire greater care in properties in the neighborhoods, and then we can let peer pressure inspire more responsible property maintenance behavior.  Where that falls short, we can fall back on our code enforcement to step in and bring people along with the rest of their neighbors.

To do that, we’ve spent a couple of sessions with City Council this spring and summer expanding the city’s authority under the code to compel better maintenance standards.  We’ve expanded code requirements, tightened standards and raised penalties, and we’re also committing to a more balanced, pro-active and reactive enforcement approach.

To put the expanded authority to work, Council has authorized taking the one part-time position that the city had to perform the majority of code functions, and make that a 40 hour a week full time job.   That change should dramatically improve our ability to sustain gentle but persistent pressure on problem properties, and to get out in front of the problem by having someone available every day to watch where blight is heading and intervene before it takes root.

These are just the start.  We’re looking at other staffing changes that we can do to bring more focus on property issues.  As you can see in the two internal memo’s below, we’re also enlisting the help of fire inspectors to do more, and we’re applying for grant funds to help us expand police presence in Kent neighborhoods.  These are all small but steady and deliberate steps we’re taking to stop talking about problems in our neighborhoods and start building better neighborhoods right now.


Attention All Kent Kayakers...

On various occassions I’ve rattled on about the prospects of using the river as a catalyst for downtown redevelopment and I’m pleased to report that after enough talk there’s actually going to be some action.  Thanks to Main Street Kent and City Parks and Rec, a river expert will be in Kent next Wednesday to investigate the river and to meet with community stakeholders in the evening for further discussion.  So consider this your invitation to be a part of the community meeting beginning at 7 pm on Wednesday, July 25th at the Kent Stage.

Here’s the link to the 2007 White Water Park Conference in Maryland that includes the presentations made about white water park issues from around the country.

Conference Presentation Link



And lastly, here’s the Main Street Press Release about the meeting this week:

Main Street Kent in partnership with the City of Kent and the Parks & Recreation Department contracted with a Whitewater consultant to evaluate the section of the river in our downtown for recreational purposes.

Mike Harvey of Recreational Engineering and Planning (RFP) will be in town next Wednesday, July 25th. He will be viewing sections of the river during the day and that evening at 7:00 p.m. he will present his initial findings in a public meeting at the Kent Stage (corner of East Main and South Depeyster) in downtown Kent.

You are all invited to attend. Hope to see you there.

Wednesday, July 25th at 7:00 p.m. at the Kent Stage.

Chip Seal...

As a former Public Works Director, I notice infrastructure wherever I go.  I do my best to not bother Kent Public Service crews with too many of my “observations” about Kent’s infrastructure but I’m sure there are days when they wish I was a former police or fire chief.  I have never been a big fan of chip seal on city streets and I must admit I cringed when I heard we pay the country each year to come in and lay down chip seal on certain Kent streets.  Chip seal has its place — but that’s usually on old country roads not city streets — so I couldn’t help but ask Gene Roberts (Kent Public Service Director) why he continues to pay the county for this stuff.  He gave a good explanation, and even though I still don’t like chip seal, at least I understand Gene’s recommendation to continue to use it.  I’ve included Gene’s explanation for your review.



Date: June 27, 2007

To: David Ruller, City Manager

From: Gene Roberts, Service Director
Chris Tolnar, City Engineer

Subject: Seal Coat Program

By Agreement, the Division of Engineering with the Portage County Engineer’s office has completed the seal coat treatment work for 2007. The following streets have received the maintenance treatment:

-Garrett Street from South End to West Main Street.
-Glad Boulevard from Rhodes Road to North end of Cul-de-Sac.
-East Hall Street from South Water Street to Vine Street.
-Hudson Road from Fairchild Avenue to the North Corp. Limit.
-Irma Street from End of Construction Limits to West Main Street.
-Louise Street from Parmalee Street to West Main Street.
-Meloy Road from South Water Street to the East Corp. Limit.
-Parmalee Street from Deidrick Road to Garrett Street.
-Sunnybrook Road the South Corp. Limit to SR261.

The City of Kent historically has maintained a portion of the roadway system network with seal coat surface treatment (also known as chip-seal or bituminous surface treatment). In the Division of Engineering’s pavement network index, approximately 26% of the City street centerline miles are identified as seal coat surface treatment streets. These roads were gravel and non-improved pavement roadway sections and over time were treated with seal coat due to dust and wet weather rutting complaints. A large portion of the seal coat treatment streets were added to the City’s inventory through annexation that included existing township streets but many have always existed as seal coat treatment streets considering this technique is one of the oldest forms of roadway maintenance.

The seal coat maintenance operation is comparable to other methods in durability and effectiveness, but costs far less. This allows the City to improve conditions on more square yards of improved roadway. The advantages of seal coat treatment operations are:

  • Improved skid resistance of pavement surface
  • Quick placement and cure time – Reduces inconvenience to traveling public
  • Provides a protective coating over the existing roadway to reduce the deteriorating effects of the sun and water penetration, through oxidation of the existing asphalt and moisture penetrating into the base and creating premature pavement failure
  • Less expensive than other options
    • Seal Coat Cost $1.70/Square Yard (2007 dollars, Single Coat)
    • 2-inch Asphalt Overlay $6.20/Square Yard (2006 dollars, Overlay only)
    • Typical 2-inch Mill & Resurface $8.70/Square Yard (2006 dollars, Mill, Pavement Fabric & Asphalt)
      • The program for 2007 encompassed 37,870 square yards of roadway to be treated. The approximate cost for 2007 was $79,000 due to several roads receiving a double coat of the treatment for added durability. For the same 37,870 square yards of roadway with 2-inchs of asphalt placed over the seal coat surface treatment would cost approximately $235,000 or if it was milled and resurfaced the cost could be around $330,000.
      • The life expectancy of a newly treated seal coat roadway is anticipated to last between 5 and 7 years, while the life expectancy of an asphalt resurface is between 10 to 12 years. Of course there are many variables that can extend or shorten the expected life of a road, however even if the seal coat lasts half as long as the asphalt, the cost is one quarter of asphalt resurfacing, resulting in an appreciable cost savings to the city and permitting other improvements to be undertaken with the already strained resources.
    • Typically, asphalt overlays are not effective on existing seal coat surface treatment roadways. The nature of the seal coat roadway is to be relatively flexible and self-healing. When a layer of asphalt, which is less flexible than seal coat, is placed on top of a seal coat pavement section the resulting asphalt surface will typically exhibit premature cracking and rutting as the base seal coat moves or deforms as it is intended. Additionally, milling (the grinding of the existing asphalt surface) does not perform well because the seal coat roadways have more bituminous material (the liquid part of the asphalt pavement) and sticks to the drum of the milling machine and/or rips out in large chunks. Consequently, in order to improve a surface treatment roadway into an asphalt section the entire roadway material should be removed and replaced with a proper asphalt section (typically 6-inches of stone sub-base, 5-1/2-inches of base course asphalt and 1-1/2-inches of surface course asphalt).

      The following information is provided to provide some scale to the reader relative to the quantity and cost associated with the City of Kent’s inventory of seal coat surface treatment roadways. Table No. 1 describes the quantity and type of pavements in the City of Kent. Table No. 2 indicates the cost to convert the chip and seal streets in the City to Asphalt pavement. The cost in 2007 dollars to single coat every chip and seal street in the City is $578,660 and with an estimated life cycle of 7-years has an annualized cost of $82,666. Conversely, the cost to convert all the chip and seal streets in the City’s inventory to asphalt would cost $7,351,436 in 2007 dollars with an estimated life cycle of 10-years with an annualized cost of $735,144. The cost reported for converting seal coat surface treatment roadways to asphalt does not include the cost necessary to upgrade storm water and utilities, which typically are required.

      Table No. 1

      City of Kent

      Pavement Type by Length and Area

      Length Area
      Pavement Type Length Length Area Area % Total % Total
      Ft. Mi. SF SY Network Network
      Asphalt Pavement 297,726 56.39 7,805,101 867,233 65.14% 66.14%
      Brick 2,859 0.54 82,173 9,130 0.63% 0.70%
      Gravel 10,335 1.96 139,820 15,536 2.26% 1.18%
      Concrete 27,265 5.16 710,366 78,930 5.97% 6.02%
      Surface Treatment (Chip Seal) 118,888 22.52 3,063,491 340,388 26.01% 25.96%
      Totals: 457,073 86.6 11,800,951 1,311,217

      Table No. 2

      Pavement Cost to Change all Chip & Seal Streets to Asphalt

      Description Unit Cost Unit Unit Cost Cost
      Surface Treatment City Wide 340,388 SY $ 1.70 $ 578,659.60
      Replace Surface Treatment with Asphalt
      (maintaining existing alignments)
      Excavation (13-inches) 122,918 CY $ 6.50 $ 798,967.00
      Subgrade Compaction 340,388 SY $ 0.50 $ 170,194.00
      Subbase (6-inces) 56731 CY $ 15.00 $ 850,965.00
      Asphalt Base (5.5-inches) 52,004 CY $ 90.00 $4,254,840.00
      Asphalt Surface (1.5-inches) 14,183 CY $ 90.00 $1,276,470.00
      Total: $7,351,436.00

      The final issue, which must be addressed regarding improving seal coat surface treatment roadways, is related to adjoining property owner equity. A property that is purchased on a fully improved asphalt street typically cost more versus a similar property that is purchased on seal coat surface treatment street. Additionally most seal coat surface treatment streets do not have the same type and kind of storm water improvements that are typically found on fully improved asphalt streets.

      In the past when the City improved streets from seal coat surface treatment to asphalt or even concrete the adjoining property owners were asked to pay for a portion of the improvement through an assessment thus offsetting the improved value of their property. The last time the City upgraded its assessment ordinance (Chapter 925) relative to what is charged for each type of improvement was for 1996. When originally written the assessment ordinance was based on the adjoining property owner(s) paying approximately one third (33-percent) of the cost of the improvement. In current dollars, a typical improvement assessment equates to approximately 20-percent and in some cases less, of the actual construction cost.

      While seal coat maintenance has many advantages, it does present some inconveniences during and immediately after application. This includes temporary dustiness (reduced greatly with slag as recommended by the County) as well as short-term presence of wet emulsion (typically called tar, but it is actually a polymer modified bituminous asphalt cement) and loose aggregate. To minimize the inconveniences the Division of Engineering contracts with a sweeping company to have the loose aggregate removed the same day or the following day, allowing the fresh stone material to embed as much as possible into the asphalt cement. The City’s Central Maintenance Division temporally places Loose Stone signs to warn the motoring public of the inconvenience.

      Therefore, while there is some short-term inconvenience with seal coat surface treatment the amount of work that can be conducted in a short time along with the cost saving benefits it is anticipated that the Division of Engineering will continue to recommend the use of seal coat maintenance in the City’s annual street programs.

Pennies From Heaven...

Louis Armstrong had enormous musical gifts, and he does one of my favorite renditions of Pennies From Heaven.  Every budget season, I break out the old CD and play Pennies from Heaven looking for a little financial inspiration from the lyrics “when it rains, it rains, pennies from heaven.”  Part of my job is to look for those puddles full of pennies but I also know that you can’t move forward with your eyes always peeled to the ground, so I try to spend an equal amount of time looking up in the sky to see where those penny clouds tend to form — and I try to do all I can to seed those clouds.  One of the most productive cloud formations comes from the arts and culture jet stream.  I’ve written many times about cultivating the creative class, but here’s an interesting article from Middlebury Vermont that talks about how that city is organizing it’s economic strategy around waterfront development and the arts (sound familiar?).

Middlebury’s creative drive gathers momentum

July 2, 2007

By Lisa D. Connell Herald Staff


MIDDLEBURY — Renewable energy, waterway development and the arts groups that give Middlebury its cultural reputation are several avenues residents and state officials will pursue to help develop the town’s economy.

These three choices are facets of the still evolving focus of the state’s Creative Communities Program. The meetings are part of a statewide discussion sponsored by the Vermont Council on Rural Development. The meetings were held at the Isley Public Library in Middlebury.

The program began May 15 with a second seminar on June 5.

Defining what a creative community and, in turn, what a creative economy is, formed the first hurdle to overcome.

“If you have a vibrant community, it feels better to live, work and play here,” said Liza Sacheli, marketing director of Middlebury College’s Center for the Arts, at the June 27 meeting. “It’s a feeling that also has a dollar sign attached to it.”

Residents in a county aiming to grow economically may first need to take a step back and review the local assets. To take a turn on a familiar adage, familiarity can breed complacency. People who have lived in one community or area for a long time may not notice the attributes their respective municipality has to offer.

Compiling a list of social service, cultural and business resource networks and contact information for people with special skills and professional expertise is one step that many communities may already have accomplished.

Certainly, there is more work to be done, but attendance at the three meetings indicates the area’s entrepreneurial spirit will likely support the ideas. At least 60 Middlebury area residents, plus state officials, filled a meeting room at the library for each of the three meetings.

According to the Web site, www.vtrural.org, Vermont communities can apply to participate in the Creative Communities forum. Those municipalities earlier accepted also include: Grand Isle County, Hardwick, Manchester, Plainfield, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham/Bellows Falls, Rutland, St. Albans City, St. Johnsbury and Windsor.

Once accepted, residents from the towns and cities do more than create a wish list. State officials, particularly Helen Labun Jordan, the director of the creative communities program, guide participants through the steps that will lead to results.

It’s a bit of trickle-down theory. Attendance at a cultural event can lead to people spending money at local eateries or service stations or municipal parking garages, for example.

Building an economic base typically means an existing company adding new jobs or a new business setting up shop in Middlebury, for example. Sacheli offered one definition of a creative economy to a man in the creative association breakout group last week. Look at the creative economy as an economic multiplier, she explained to a group of 24 people in one section of the library.

Recycle local money that’s already in a community and find new ways to bring more money in, Sacheli said.

It’s not a simple process, especially when defining or branding a city or town, said Patricia Kreitzer, chairwoman of the arts committee for the Creative Economy Initiative in Rutland. Kreitzer said Rutland’s efforts to follow a creative economy model began at least two years ago. It takes time and concerted effort to move the three proposed development paths of energy, water and arts to an economic entity that produces income, she said.

What’s next: Each of the three groups will have follow-up meetings. Additionally, a fourth group evolved from Thursday night’s meeting, an incubator group, aimed at building further business projects. Nancy Malcolm, chairwoman of Middlebury’s creative economy planning group, is the local contact for this project.

Ted Brady, who works for Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., is the facilitator of the waterway group. This group will focus on Otter Creek as an economic and natural resource. Two challenging ideas are building a boardwalk for pedestrians to stroll near the creek or river and eyeing financial solutions to develop and market the waterway.

“Public-private partnerships aren’t the easiest thing to put together,” Brady said.

Middlebury resident Steve Maier will guide countywide residents interested in making more use of renewable energy. Maier told all those present, in a wrap-up of the 2-1/2-hour program, that the energy group is at a good starting point, given the college’s ecological plan. Earlier, Middlebury College pledged to become carbon-neutral before 2020.

What Exactly Are Mixed-Use, Lifestyle Centers Anyw...

Every industry has its own buzz words, acronyms and catch phrases that give the profession a sense of fraternity while keeping the rest of us scratching our heads wondering what the heck they’re talking about. The development industry is no exception and as trends come and go the vocabulary they use changes with the times.  These days there’s a lot of talk about mixed-use, lifestyle centers.  We all nod our heads and act like we know what they mean but there are days when I’m not so sure.  To that end, here’s a the best article I’ve ever read on the topic (from the Shopping Center News) that helps dispel the confusion by giving lots of examples of what developers are building that they call mixed use, or was that multi-use?

Feature Article, June 2007

Mastering Mixed-Use

What exactly is mixed-use? Investigating the industry’s most ambiguous label yields a lot of opinions and a few answers.

Randall Shearin
Poag & McEwen is developing Highland Row, a mixed-use project in Memphis, Tennessee, that will feature 100,000 square feet of retail with residential space above.

From massive projects like Victory Park in Dallas and Atlantic Station in Atlanta, to smaller projects like Highland Row in Memphis, Tennessee, mixed-use development is everywhere these days. But what defines mixed-use? Is it a shopping center with 10,000 square feet of office above? Is it a lifestyle center surrounded by power retail and apartments? Shopping Center Business asked a number of expert developers across the country to share their opinions of what creates a mixed-use project and what parameters they use in deciding whether a project is mixed-use.

We also wanted to know why everyone is developing mixed-use. Where is the demand coming from? Who is driving the industry to develop mixed-use properties? We’ve also seen a trend of mixed-use being developed in the suburbs, where strip centers and sprawl traditionally have ruled. Why are developers choosing suburban and rural areas to build mixed-use, vertical projects?

Mixed-use vs. Multi-use
Levis Commons, Hill Partners’ project in Perrysburg, Ohio, is cited by other developers as a successful mixed-use project.

There has been a debate surfacing in the industry for a while about mixed-use projects versus multi-use projects. Some developers feel that many are inappropriately calling their projects mixed-use.

“I’ve heard mixed-use described as an apartment building with a dry cleaners and a cafÉ at the bottom,” says Brian Jones, CEO of Forest City Commercial Development, Western Region. “And I’ve heard mixed-use used in reference to huge communities where you have housing and other uses. It is a misused name.”

Jones’ comment leads to the root of the debate: any project with more than one use can seemingly be termed mixed-use by a developer. Along with the term “lifestyle center,” mixed-use is the industry’s other ambiguous term.

“A true mixed-use application by our definition is multiple uses in the same building,” says Craig Kaser, president of TerreMark Partners, LLC, based in Atlanta. His thoughts are echoed by many developers, who believe that projects that have many different property types in separate buildings should be termed “multi-use.” If that’s the case, then a center with an adjacent hotel or an apartment building should be multi-use, not mixed-use, despite whether a single developer controls the land.

Forest City’s Jones refers to the company’s Victoria Gardens project in Rancho Cucamonga, California, as a great example of a multi-use project. Containing retail, multifamily and civic uses, Victoria Gardens spans 147 acres.

“Multi-use would be more horizontal in nature,” says Jones. “You have a number of uses in a planned project. As an example, I would describe our Victoria Gardens project, where we have a number of uses within one plan, as multi-use. Our Westminster project, where we have residential, lifestyle and power retail and office space, is multi-use. It is a meaningful plan that incorporates all those uses. There are a lot of multi-use projects underway.”

Most of the developers SCB talked to agree. Overall, they also agreed that retail will create the draw, but residential and office space also must have a demand in the market to make the project viable. They also thought that mixed-use should be vertical by nature and that each use must serve its purpose independently, yet work together.

“A project is mixed-use if it has two or more uses that are both meaningful in scale and well thought out as independent parts,” says Terry Montesi, CEO of Trademark Properties. “I don’t consider a large lifestyle center with 20,000 to 30,000 square feet of incidental, not particularly well executed office or residential space to be real mixed-use. It is only pasted on to give the illusion of mixed-use.”

For Poag & McEwen, one of the largest developers of lifestyle centers in the U.S. who has also been developing mixed-use projects, mixed-use also takes on a similar meeting.

Hill Partners is developing Biltmore Village in Asheville, North Carolina.

“We consider having multiple uses in different buildings to be multi-use,” says Joshua Poag, CFO and executive vice president of Poag & McEwen. “This has been the traditional way of development over the last 50 years. You develop a mall or shopping center, next to that you have a neighborhood of homes and sometimes you have an office park nearby. By our definition, mixed-use is vertically integrated.”

There does seem to be one exception to the rule that mixed-use must be vertical, that some developers take. That is, if there are multiple uses in separate buildings, they must be located within a walkable environment. This definition would still exclude shopping centers with hotels or power centers on the periphery where the shopper is more likely to drive. It would include, however, communities where residents of an apartment building are likely to walk half a block to the retail component.

“In a walkable community, having uses in separate buildings does not break up the mix, as it were, but rather contributes to the overall diversity of the project,” says John Crossman, president of Florida-based Crossman & Company.

Allegiance Development is developing Rayzor Ranch, a mixed-use center in Denton, Texas.

“Our position is that the components must be walkable to be considered mixed-use,” adds Randy Holcombe, executive vice president of Allegiance Development, developer of Rayzor Ranch in Denton, Texas.

“I don’t believe that multiple uses have to be in the same building,” says Gary Safady, managing partner of O&S Holdings, which is developing three projects in Texas, Illinois and Alabama. “What is important is that there is synergy between the uses and that each component complement each other. It is important that there is the opportunity to create cross traffic and sales.”

McCaffery Interests developed The Market Common, Clarendon, in Arlington, Virginia. The project was one of one most commonly cited by other developers as a great example of mixed-use in the U.S.

But the real difference, say others, is the way a project is developed. Is it being developed as a single project, or multiple projects developed on one piece of land?

“There is a very distinct difference between mixed-use and multi-use,” says Clayton McCaffery, vice president of Chicago-based McCaffery Interests, developers of the award winning mixed-use project The Market Common, Clarendon, in Arlington, Virginia. “A mixed-use project requires the skill of the developer to thoughtfully and creatively work with investors, retailers, residents and office occupants to understand and feel comfortable with the integration of each party’s interests and demands into a single cohesive project.”

How Many Uses?
McCaffery Interests is developing The Market Common, Myrtle Beach, a mixed-use project, on the site of a former Air Force base in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

Most developers SCB interviewed generally agreed with the definition that a mixed-use project must have three or more significant uses and physical integration that create a single plan. Some developers narrow the number of uses down to two when the project contains multifamily or office and retail. Most developers also agreed that retail was the sector that was a must-have in mixed-use development, with multifamily a close second, followed by hospitality third and office fourth. Most developers did not have a hard formula of percentages that they allocated to each sector when developing mixed-use.

“Percentages are more often dictated by local demand factors,” says Rodney Tucker, CEO of Citation Development, who is developing three mixed-use projects in the Las Vegas market. “Each component should act as a catalyst to support and enhance the complementing adjacent components.”

Retail is generally the most noticeable of the sectors in a mixed-use environment. It is what creates the energy of the project, as well as what mainly attracts outside visitors and makes them feel a part of the project. Office, multifamily and hotel uses must have significant demand to warrant their participation.

“Retail is what adds vitality and traffic to an otherwise staid environment,” says Poag. “Beyond the ground floor, either office or residential will work, as long as the uses are justified, independent of the project being mixed-use. In a more traditional setting, a roughly 3-to-1 office or residential to retail seems to work in order to give the project proper scale and density. Obviously, in a CBD, your rations may become more skewed as your density increases.”

But the higher the number of uses, the larger the challenge is in creating a successful project, say some developers.

O&S Holdings’ Bridge Street project in Huntsville, Alabama.

“For every use that you introduce, the complexities of the development increase dramatically,” says Dougall McCorkle, vice president of commercial properties for The Lutgert Companies. “Each use will often have opposing needs. Office space and retailers both need convenient parking, for example, but parking for office space is static while retailers need those spaces to turn over quickly. Non-retail uses need ground floor access and visibility, but it has to be done in a manner that it doesn’t create dead zones in the retail landscape. Also, restaurants and residential units obviously have opposing needs when it comes to noise and energy.”

A lot of mixed-use projects are driven by developers whose history is in retail development, though most of the developers SCB interviewed have altered their practice to focus specifically on mixed-use properties. Some retail developers have brought partners in to develop other uses in a center.

“If you bring in co-developers to develop certain uses of the project, then a whole new set of complications arise,” says McCorkle. “Factoring in the inevitable financing requirements from the lender in regards to the pre-leasing office versus retail space and pre-selling condos really takes a lot of skill, patience and, perhaps, luck to make the stars and moon align enough to pull it all off.”

Why Is Everyone Developing Mixed-Use?
The reason why every developer is developing mixed-use isn’t because every consumer wants to live, shop and work in the same place. All developers concede that no amount of multifamily space in a project is going to support the retail alone. They must draw from the greater market. Retail and restaurants are the draw that pulls consumers to mixed-use projects. Thus, the market must first have a demand for the additional retail that the center will provide. Consumer attraction to the product type — mainly because it is unique — is another reason. The pressure on developers from communities to lessen sprawl is also a factor.

“The driving factor for mixed-use projects is actually a combination of factors: rising land costs, lengthy commute times, increasing fuel costs, less spare time, the ‘hassle factor,’ and the need for a place with which people can identify and call their own,” says Woody Mann, Jr., president of Vista Equities Group.

Consumers are cited as a chief driving force, and developers are responding to their wants. As lifestyles change, so do consumers needs. Currently, the baby boomers and Generation Y have been cited as the most influential factors in the lifestyle retail and mixed-use development trends.

“Consumers across the nation have gotten a sweet taste of mixed-use developments and have a craving for more,” says McCorkle. “There is a growing knee-jerk reaction to sprawling suburbia. People want to reconnect with the urban feel of a downtown, especially as they become empty-nesters. It just has to be done in a manner that there’s a compromise between lifestyles.”

As consumers move from the suburbs back to the cities, they are moving away from their traditional shopping nodes, says Poag.

“In order to service this growing trend of moving back to the urban core, you need to find sites that are typically expensive and small,” he says. “In order to make the numbers work you need to go vertical to spread the land, site and infrastructure costs over more square footage.”

Consumers aren’t the only ones changing their attitudes. Some developers have a philosophy that the vertical nature of mixed-use development is more responsible to the land and to the communities where they are developing. They are preventing sprawl and, at the same time, giving the community a place that it needs with the retailers, restaurants and amenities that the residents want.

“Mixed-use development is a more socially responsible, holistic approach than traditional, single-use development,” says Kaser.

JTS Realty Services, which is developing a second phase of Perkins Rowe, a mixed-use center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, also sees mixed-use as a plus to the community.

“Mixed-use projects are less invasive to the suburban community because of their density,” says Clayton Peterson, development director for JTS. “Mixed-use complements the downtown revitalization trend rather than competing with it.”

“‘Community building’ is the action phrase that best describes the driving factor that perpetuates the continued interest in mixed-use developments,” concludes McCaffery.

High-End Feel
Most mixed-use development has lent itself to lifestyle retail, mainly because the types of communities where the projects are developed have demographics consistent with those of lifestyle retailers. Lifestyle retailers have also been expanding at the same time that mixed-use projects have been flourishing across the country. There’s another reason that developers like to create mixed-use projects with lifestyle components: enhanced return on investment.

“The addition of hotels, multifamily housing or office components adds another dimension to a lifestyle center development, attracting consumers for yet another reason,” says Robert H. Spratt, Jr., president of Hill Partners. “These additional synergistic uses also help to offset the higher land and construction costs that typically accompany a prime real estate location.”

Another characteristic of mixed-use centers is that they are generally upscale. Restaurants and retailers in the developments tend to cater to the high end of the market. Developers say that the nature of the business — high land costs, the costs of construction and the retail rents required to sustain the projects — necessitate upper-end retailers. Also, many agree that residents choosing to live in mixed-use developments do not want to live next to discount retailers and restaurants.

“You don’t see too many projects looking to have anything other than a fairly upscale retail component,” says McCorkle. “People wouldn’t choose to live above something sub-standard or low end. It probably wouldn’t be a wise investment. Likewise, office users, if they are driven by locational convenience, prestige probably comes into play. They probably wouldn’t choose to locate their prestigious law practice over an off-track betting outlet.”

For developers like Poag & McEwen and Hill Partners, whose history is in lifestyle retail, upscale retail is important to make the centers successful in their eyes.

“We feel the retail component must include high-quality retailers,” says Poag. “Exactly who those retailers are will completely depend on the surrounding demographics and the competition close by.”

“The difference in shoppers is simple: lifestyle center shoppers come for the reason, not the season,” says Spratt. “The results are higher per visit transactions than that of a traditional retail mall. In the process, retailers built loyalty due to the full integration of the overall property into the shopper’s life, by virtue of a more personal approach.”

Developers find that the sales per square foot are higher in mixed-use environments because of the projects’ attractiveness and differentiation in the market from other projects.

“Mixed-use projects are typically a better experience for retail tenants and residential tenants and owners,” says Peterson. “When designed properly, mixed-use retail and residential will generate higher sales per square foot and higher rents. The open-air town center with mixed-use is on the forefront of retail development. Both restaurants and retailers enjoy increased traffic because of project density.”

Performance is another driving factor. “We find that when we are able to combine the right use, our project perform considerably better and that translates into a stronger asset and ultimately higher rents,” says Jeff Ziegler, executive vice president of retail development for Continental Retail Development.

In smaller markets and areas where the mixed-use project also doubles as a town center, place-making has become more important than the retail mix.

“The key is to create an environment where people want to stop, slow down and be entertained in a comfortable environment that makes them feel good about the world that they live in,” says Holcombe. “This does not need to be a ‘luxe’ environment, but rather a place that they want to visit time and time again.”

That place-making also allows for the center to be thought of as a place where visitors like to be.

“Real ‘places’ don’t go vacant through long periods of the day,” says Buss. “Sustainability is the driving factor. People are looking for an experience today as much as for a simple purchase. Look at retailers like Build-A-Bear Workshop, Starbucks Coffee and American Girl Place.”

Locating a mixed-use project in a middle market can also breed success, especially if the project creates a draw for surrounding residents.

“We like high-end projects, but our core projects tend to attract middle and upper ends [of the market],” says Crossman. “While ‘high-end’ tends to connote higher dollars, a diverse market is a great thing. It can maximize rents, value and traffic in other ways.”

Diversity is still a goal in high-end centers — not gentrification. “The project should always reach for more upscale, but not push too hard, [which can cause] excessive gentrification,” says Chris Hanessian, senior vice president of University Town Center, Inc., developer of the 1.5 million-square-foot University Town Center in Hyattsville, Maryland. “Some centers may offer employment to low-wage earners who eat and shop at certain retail establishments; other centers may cater to a wealthier clientele. Either can work as long as you strive for diversity, safety and a true mix of uses.”

“We are developing mixed-use projects in affluent, secondary markets that are under-retailed,” says O&S’s Safady. “These markets have the ability to draw from larger areas, similar to super-regional shopping centers.”

Adds Buss, “Long term, mixed-use development is what can make a community special and a great place to live versus being ordinary.”

City Vs. Suburbs
Where should mixed-use developments go? The answer is, seemingly, everywhere. Mixed-use projects are being developed in the downtowns of large cities like Dallas and Washington, D.C., to small towns like Willoughby, Ohio, and Malvern, Pennsylvania.

“Mixed-use developments can create town squares or even downtown environments in areas that you may not expect,” says Safady. “Because they provide a multitude of experiences, they become true destinations.”

TerreMark Partners is developing Chagrin River Walk in Willoughby, Ohio.

Central business districts are a natural choice for mixed-use. High land costs in urban areas almost necessitate mixed-use if anything other than office is going to be developed. In Atlanta, Selig Enterprises and Daniel Corporation are creating 12th & Midtown, a multi-block mixed-use project that will contain retail, residential, hotel and office uses. In Dallas, phases of the huge Victory Park project are open. And in Brooklyn, New York, Forest City Ratner has Atlantic Yards planned. Middle markets are also seeing mixed-use thrive as well. In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, McCaffery Interests is developing The Market Common, Myrtle Beach, on the site of a former Air Force base. The 121-acre project will feature 600,000 square feet of retail, 181 luxury rental apartments and 1,441 for-sale townhomes and condominiums. Smaller markets, as well, have their fair share of mixed-use developments underway. TerreMark Partners is developing a 360,000-square-foot mixed-use project that will contain retail, restaurants, offices and multifamily space in Willoughby, Ohio, called Chagrin River Walk. In Malvern, Pennsylvania, along Philadelphia’s Main Line, Philadelphia-based O’Neill Properties is developing a high-end mixed-use project called Worthington.

Suburban areas, in particular, benefit from mixed-use developments because they define the town by giving it a center.

“Suburbia typically lacks any sense of community so the mixed-use development becomes the proxy for the new downtown,” says McCorkle.

Tim Murnane, senior vice president and general manager of Opus Northwest, agrees: “Many newer suburban communities are void of town centers and consider live-work-play components of a horizontal mixed-use project a solution,” he says. “For example, the downtown/main street design of our Burr Ridge Village Center [in suburban Chicago] is bringing vitality to a 50-year-old community that has ideal demographics for national lifestyle tenants, retail capacity and available land.”

Opus Northwest is also active in the suburban markets of Chino Hills, California (developing Shoppes at Chino Hills), Suwanee, Georgia (developing Suwanee Gateway), and suburban Austin, Texas (developing Hill Country Galleria).

LaCenterra at Cinco Ranch, a mixed-use project by Vista Equities Group in Katy, Texas, had several retailers report forecast-shattering sales of 90 percent to 440 percent over projection during its opening weekend in March.

“Depending on the size of the metropolitan area, mixed-use in suburban areas is very important,” says Mann of Vista Equities Group, who is developing two mixed-use projects, including LaCenterra at Cinco Ranch in Katy, Texas, a Houston suburb. “If you can offer suburban residents a quality shopping-dining-office-living choice in a more relaxed setting — something they can identify with and call their own — it’s a recipe for success.”

“Mixed-use projects help to create the New Urbanism feel that is so popular with customers; they create ‘clean cities’ within the suburbs,” adds Holcombe.

As with any mixed-use project, developers feel it is important for the demand for all uses in the project to exist in suburban markets.

Vista Equities’ LaCenterra at Cinco Ranch is one of the latest mixed-use projects to open in the U.S.

“At our project in Pearland, Texas, we are doing roughly 350,000 square feet of retail with about 250 apartments,” says Poag. “There is high demand [in the market] for both retail and residential. Therefore, mixed-use works and is important. If the demand were not there, then it would not be as important.”

Hill Partners, which is developing projects in middle markets like Asheville, North Carolina, and Charleston, South Carolina, agrees.

“We are proponents of suburban mixed-use developments where the market demand supports the addition of other uses above retail,” says Spratt.

Favorites
OliverMcMillan’s Glen Town Center in Glenview, Illinois, was also cited as a good example of mixed-use development. The center is built on the site of a former Naval Air Station.

Asked what their favorite mixed-use projects in existence were, developers named more projects in suburban areas than in urban areas. One often mentioned answer was Southlake Commons, located in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. Reston Town Center in suburban Washington, D.C., was another project cited for its office, residential and hotel uses mixed with main street retail. Others included Mizner Park in Boca Raton, Florida, and Kierland Commons in Scottsdale, Arizona. Others pointed to McCaffery’s Market Common, Clarendon in Virginia, and OliverMcMillan’s The Glen Town Center in Glenview, Illinois.

Mixed-use centers in urban areas also fared well. A favorite of the group was Federal Realty Investment Trust’s Santana Row, in San Jose, California. Related’s Time Warner Center in New York City and CityPlace in West Palm Beach, Florida, were mentioned, as were Victory Park in Dallas and Water Tower Place in Chicago.

SCB interviewed the following executives for this article:

Paul Buss, president of San Diego-based OliverMcMillan. One of the preeminent developers of mixed-use projects, OliverMcMillan currently has five mixed-use projects underway from Illinois to California.

John M. Crossman, president of Orlando-based Crossman & Company. The company is working on The Villages, a mixed-use community near Orlando.

Chris Hanessian, senior vice president of University Town Center, Inc. in Hyattsville, Maryland. This project has over 1.5 million square feet of office, retail and entertainment uses, as well as for-sale condominiums and student housing.

Randy Holcombe, executive vice president of Allegiance Development. Allegiance is the developer of Rayzor Ranch, a new mixed-use project in Denton, Texas.

Forest City is developing Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn, one of the largest mixed-use projects underway in the U.S.

Brian Jones, CEO, Forest City Commercial Development, Western Region. Forest City has developed a number of mixed-use and multi-use projects, including Victoria Gardens in Rancho Cucamonga, California, Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn, New York, and Westfield San Francisco Centre in San Francisco.

Craig Kaser, president of TerreMark Partners, LLC. Based in Atlanta, the company is currently developing mixed-use projects in urban and suburban environments, including Chagrin River Walk along the Chagrin River in Willoughby, Ohio.

Woody Mann, Jr., president, Vista Equities Group. Vista Equities’ latest mixed-use project is LaCenterra at Cinco Ranch in Katy, Texas.

Clayton McCaffery, vice president, McCaffery Interests. McCaffery Interests has developed The Market Common, Clarendon, in Arlington, Virginia, and is developing The Market Common, Myrtle Beach, in South Carolina.

Dougall McCorkle, vice president of commercial properties, The Lutgert Companies. The company is developing The Mercato, a high-end mixed-use center in Naples, Florida.

Terry Montesi, chairman and CEO of Fort Worth, Texas-based Trademark Property Company. The company has a number of mixed-use projects underway.

Tim Murnane, senior vice president of Opus Northwest, LLC. Opus currently has mixed-use/lifestyle center projects underway in suburban Chicago; suburban Austin, Texas; Chino Hills, California; and Suwanee, Georgia.

Clayton A. Peterson, development director for JTS Realty Services, developer of Perkins Rowe, a mixed-use project in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Joshua D. Poag, CFO and executive vice president of Poag & McEwen Lifestyle Centers. Based in Memphis, Tennessee, the company has two mixed-use properties underway, including Memphis’ Highland Row.

Gary Safady, managing partner of Los Angeles-based O&S Holdings LLC. O&S is developing several mixed-use projects in Huntsville, Alabama; McKinney, Texas; and Chicago.

Robert H. Spratt, Jr., president of Hill Partners, Inc. Based in Charlotte, North Carolina, Hill Partners develops lifestyle centers with mixed-use components. The company is working on four projects in the Carolinas.

Rodney L. Tucker, CEO of New Zealand-based Citation Property Group. The company is developing three mixed-use projects, its first in the U.S., in the Las Vegas market.

Jeff Ziegler, executive vice president of retail development for Columbus, Ohio-based Continental Retail Development.


« Previous Entries