nav-left cat-right
cat-right

Festive Friday and Heritage Fest Saturday in Downt...

Festive Friday and Heritage Fest Saturday  In Downtown Kent

Leading into the July 4th weekend, Kent kicks things off with Festive Friday downtown at the Home Savings Plaza with live music from 5 pm to 7 pm and then the movie The Princess Bride at 9 pm.  Festive Friday is sponsored by the Standing Rock Cultural Arts and Downtown Innovative Community Events (aka DICE).  So grab a chair and a couple of friends and come out and enjoy a warm summer evening with your Kent neighbors in a relaxed family friendly setting in the heart of downtown Kent. And Friday night is just the prelude to what’s in story for Saturday’s Heritage Festival.

Festive Friday
I went to a couple of the outdoor summer movie showings last year before my family joined me in Kent and I’ve been anxiously awaiting the start of this season to bring them along.  We’re already packed and ready to go 24 hours in advance.  Our plan is to meet up with some family friends (Rich, Kelly, Brandon and Katelyn Gonos) after work at the Home Savings Plaza, grab something to eat in the restaurants along Franklin Avenue, catch some of the live music and top the night off with the movie The Princess Bride (click here to watch the trailer).

It’s been a number of years since I last saw this movie so I’m looking forward to catching it again, but best of all this time I get to watch it on Kent Parks and Rec new giant inflatable movie screen.  How cool is this thing…

Thanks to donations from gracious people all over town, Kent Parks and Rec has been able to purchase this new screen as part of our effort to give the youth of all ages in Kent another reason to come spend time enjoying downtown Kent.  I saw a similar screen in Toronto at their outdoor plaza theater, so now Toronto’s got nothing on us.

Saturday will be Kent’s renowned Heritage Fest.  The Heritage Fest holds special meaning for me, not because it’s an amazing downtown event, but because it marks my 1 year anniversary as Kent’s City Manager.  Just about this time last year I rolled into town and Dan Smith with the Chamber tried to convince me that the City was throwing a party in my honor and they were calling it the Heritage Festival.  So just last week Dan gave me a heads up on my one year anniversary party that he had arranged that again he was calling the Heritage Fest.

Regardless of the reason for the party (do you really need a reason to party?), it was a great time for all ages last year and I’m sure this one will be even better.  So whatever you’re into I’m pretty sure you’ll find it in downtown Kent this weekend.  And although this event has become so popular that it brings thousands of people downtown, it is also so well run that it manages to keep that small town charm and more personalized feel that is all Kent.

If food, music, sights, sounds and smells aren’t enough to bring you down during the day, you definitely don’t want to miss the nighttime fireworks show.  It’s a terrific show that will set the mood leading up to July 4th.

I’ll see you there.

Kent Bicentennial Plan: A Blueprint For Tomorrow...

Kent Bicentennial Plan: A Blueprint for Tomorrow

Before applying for the position of City Manager in Kent I did my homework on-line to see what I could learn about what Kent was thinking and where it wanted to go as a community.  I invested that time because when it comes to an executive position like City Manager it’s all about the fit between the person and the city so I wanted to try to get a read on how well I would fit in Kent.

As a prospective City Manager you are looking for a community that is thinking about its future and is working off of a plan to get there.  I don’t want to waste my time and energy on a place that could care less about its future.  That’s why Kent had me at page 1 of the Bicentennial Plan (Download the Executive Summary).  I knew then that Kent was a place I wanted to be a part of.

Now, with a year under my belt in Kent I’ve learned that Bicentennial Plan is not universally admired which is unfortunate because it is a product to be proud of, and to those outside the city it is looked upon as a terrific example of how a community can come together to co-create a vision.  It’s impressive not just to us city manager types, but trust me, business executives look for that kind of stuff too.  If they’re going to make a business investment in a community they want to know that community takes it’s future seriously.  To that end, the Bicentennial Plan is more than a long term strategy for sustainable prosperity it is also one of the most powerful marketing tools available to us today.

But don’t just take my word for it, consider the fact that a team of nationally recognized experts at the International City Manager Association (ICMA) reviewed community plans from all over the country and then awarded Kent the top honor (see award summary) for cities with populations between 10,000 and 50,000.  Out of hundreds of cities that fall in that category, Kent is #1.  Regardless of whether you like everything in the Plan or not, that is an accomplishment worth celebrating — and frankly if we’re not highlighting this national recognition in everything we do and leveraging that to our marketing advantage, then shame on us.

To this day, Kent city staff are still being asked to speak at national conferences about the Bicentennial Plan.  We get inquiries from cities all over the country asking for advice on how to replicate our work and Kent is featured as a “best practice” for community planning.  Yet here in our own backyard the Bicentennial Plan is not only underappreciated it is a frequent target for criticism rather than the critical acclaim Kent is receiving everywhere else for it.

How did this happen?

Since I’m the new guy, the best I can offer is my third party speculation which means it is not necessarily any more valuable than the other 27,835 different answers you’d get if you talked to each city resident but since I’ve heard close to 8,221 of them perhaps I can offer a useful summary.  It seems to me that there is a misunderstanding about what the Bicentennial Plan is and what it is not.

It is a vision not a project going out to bid for tomorrow.
It is a process that tried to translate aspirations to paper. It is not a contract written in blood and etched in stone.
It is a catalyst not a conclusion.
It was a way to engage our community creativity that tries to move us forward and use that forward momentum to bring positive change.

I emphasize these points because it seems that some people saw the high quality of the product and assumed it was a done deal.  They jumped from vision to real live project in about 4 seconds and immediately assumed the bulldozers would be heading down the street the next day.  Of course that couldn’t be further from the truth but once that seed was planted it was hard to pull that weed out by its roots.

So instead of working from a blueprint for building community as the Plan was originally conceived, some people have tried to reduce the Plan into a series of politically motivated platitudes that we let divide us rather than unify us.  I get that it’s really hard to get thousands of people to agree on anything and I accept that the Plan can not make everyone happy.  But to me this isn’t an exercise in happiness, this is the practice of leadership.  This is about looking within and being honest enough with ourselves to acknowledge what’s working in our hometown and what’s not.  It’s having the wisdom to know that sometimes honoring our legacy means making changes to the way we’ve always done things because times have changed around us while we’ve been busy reminiscing and now what we’ve always done isn’t doing it anymore.  I was always told that “when you’re riding a dead horse, it’s time to dismount.”

As a newcomer, it’s been quite confusing to hear so many people vent their distress over Kent’s economic challenges and demand more leadership from their city government in one breath and then reject the very thing that was developed to give the city the direction it needed to respond to its economic challenges.  I’m not saying the Bicentennial Plan is perfect but you can’t steer a ship that isn’t moving and the Plan gives us something to move to.

The practical side of me says “let’s get started” and accept the fact that we may not agree on our exact destination yet but it’s clearly not where we are today so let’s take some inspiration and guidance from the Plan and build the momentum we’re going to need to get wherever it is we finally decide to go.   I have enough faith in our collective will and capabilities as a community to believe that together we’ll figure out where we’re going and how to get there once we get started.

Kids For Kent, Part 2...

Kids For Kent, Part 2

In a blog posting back in early May (May 3, Youth of All Ages) I showcased artwork by Kent elementary school kids that illustrated their favorite Kent spots.  They made pictures of the Standing Rock, PufferBelly, parks, their schools, the library, the river and much more.  Not to be outdone elementary kids from St. Patricks Catholic school sent the Mayor letters thanking him for their favorite things in Kent.  Those letters have some great insights that only a kid could see — so I encourage you to take a minute to see what our kids love about Kent.

Kent Bicentennial...

Kent Bicentennial

If you haven’t had reason to notice the giant banner hanging on the Police station at the intersection of Water Street and Haymaker Parkway, or if you’ve missed the articles in the paper, the painted windows or posters downtown, the City of Kent is celebrating it’s 200th birthday this year.  In honor of this milestone a small committee of Kent volunteers have put together events and programs that will go on all year long.  One musically inclined Kent resident actually wrote and recorded a song called “That’s Kent” that can be downloaded for free and will be performed by Kent’s kids (including my 8 year old) during the heritage festival.

From art shows, to movies, guest speakers, picnics, time capsules, tours, banners, you name it — the Kent Bicentennial year will be filled with things for the youth of all ages to participate in.  The theme is “Honoring our heritage, shaping our future” and besides having fun the goals of the year long programming is to:

1. Focus attention on Kent, it’s history, it’s people, schools, businesses and organizations;

2. Relfect on Kent’s heritage, remembering and paying respect to the people who came before us;

3. Plan events that appeal to a variety of interests and ages, with as many downtown events as possible;

4. Bring schools, businesses, organizations and citizens together to enhance existing relationships and build new ones;

5. Create a permanent memorial commemorating the Bicentennial year.
There’s a lot of great stuff planned and it’s all very impressive but my favorite event is the plan to have 200 children (or as close to that number as they can get) in the parade singing the new “That’s Kent” theme song.  I had the pleasure of having a live version of this played in my living room by my next door neighbor– who happens to be co-author and headline performer of it, Hal Walker.

Hal’s original version is great Download the Kent Song and the Song Lyrics but I can’t wait to hear and see the kids perform it at Heritage Fest.  I’m sure it will be a show stopper.

In the spirit of celebrating Kent’s past here’s a link to some good historical photos.  Kent Historical Photos

To keep current on the planned events or if you want to volunteer for some of the events, contact the Kent Chamber at 330 673-9855.

Public Private Partnership Transforms Deterioratin...

Public-private partnership turns decrepit store into shops & apts.

By Betsy Bean, Small Cities Publishing

Probably most historic downtowns have at least one vacant, deteriorating “white elephant” of a structure that nobody knows what to do with. Shelby, N.C. (pop. 20,000) is no exception. In 1984, when Belk department store moved to the new mall, (sound familiar?) the saga began. The 40,000 sq. ft., 1920s brick building stood mostly vacant for the next six years. While it didn’t look so bad from the outside, there were huge holes in the roof, causing everything in it to be sopping wet, and covered with mold and mildew. It was so bad that Ted Alexander, the director of Uptown Shelby Association, contracted pneumonia from going in the building too much.

“We’d go stand around and watch it fall in,” recalls Alexander. By 1990, the choices looked grim; the most viable appeared to be demolition and make do with a parking lot. But no one, not the city nor the downtown leadership, really wanted to see a huge, prominent hole in the middle of town. In order to stave off destruction, the mayor at that time persuaded the owners to donate the building to the fledgling Cleveland County Arts Council, which only agreed to take it to get the building into sympathetic hands. Unfortunately, studies showed the building was indeed too far gone for use by the Council.

It was then that city government stepped up to the plate. Agreeing to a complicated swap/purchase, the city purchased the historic, former post office building from the county and donated it to the Arts Council with protective covenants. In return, the city reluctantly agreed to accept the Belk building from the Arts Council if Uptown Shelby would obtain an option, guarantee its development, and pay the city $25,000 once it was developed.

“We were all, staff and council, very skeptical in the beginning,” recalls Hal Mason, assistant city manager. “It took the leadership of Uptown Shelby to convince us the project would work.”

A cast of thousands
From 1992 to 2000, the effort to save the old department store came to resemble a Hollywood production that included the efforts of many different actors, a lot of plot changes, and a struggle for financing. The first thing Uptown Shelby did was bring in a resource team from the North Carolina Development Association in 1992. The team concluded that even though the building was in the worst condition they had ever seen, it still had merit within the architectural and commercial context of uptown. A layout and pro forma analysis showed the financial feasibility of converting one-third of the building into six 1,000 sq. ft. storefronts and six upstairs apartments, using two-thirds of the back for parking.

Using this report, Uptown Shelby contacted dozens of potential developers throughout 1992. They hit paydirt when one board member saw a newspaper article about Ron Morgan, a creative architect/developer in Charlotte. They contacted Morgan who was so enamored of the project that he brought in a partner and they agreed to take no upfront funding for architectural work and planning in return for a one-sixth equity share in the building. In 1994, a local banker took it upon himself the huge task of assembling a group of private investors and a loan pool with participation from six uptown banks. The banks agreed to finance 100 percent of the $1.3 million project at one-half point below prime rate. The unique aspect of the loan was that the full financing was based on the ability of the investors to obtain the 20 percent federal tax credit and a five percent state tax credit for rehabbing a historic property. The deal was predicated on the investors obtaining their credits and then repaying that portion of the full loan. In essence, the tax credits were serving as the investors 20 percent down payment.

A local attorney and Uptown Shelby board member then volunteered thousands of dollars worth of his time to create an LLC (limited liability corporation), which would make it easier to recruit investors because of the LLC’s greater flexibility for those wishing to take advantage of tax credits. At the same time that a financing vehicle was being developed, Uptown Shelby was continuing to explore all types of scenarios, everything from low income housing to rehabbing the whole building. The various studies were consuming time and money, which were rapidly running out by 1996 when a plan was finally submitted to the National Park Service based on the original idea of turning the building into shops and apartments. Incredibly, they rejected it!

With virtually every avenue of funds dried up, Uptown Shelby applied for and received a $2,000 grant from the National Trust for Historic Preservation that was used to pay the architect to draw up yet one more plan; heretofore, he had been paid nothing for years. Finally, a compromise was reached with the National Park Service, which had not been satisfied with the plan to only leave the walls around the parking area. The new plan was approved, which involved keeping all of the steel frame structure and two elevator shafts as well as construction of a truss system that suggested a rafter system. The Park Service approved the new plan on the day the city council had to vote whether to extend Uptown Shelby’s option or demolish the property. On top of that the city was persuaded to spend the $100,000 it had budgeted for demolition on cleaning out the interior.

“Our patience was stretched to the nth degree many times and toward the end, the city had to make some concessions we hadn’t intended to make,” says Mason. “But once the project got its own momentum, we recognized our role was as important as that of the developer.”

Finally, following a couple of near disastrous mishaps during interior demolition, the building was transferred by the city on June 30, 1997 to Uptown Shelby, which, in turn, sold it, with protective covenants, for $1 to Lafayette Street LLC. To ensure the viability of the project, Uptown Shelby also committed its $65,000 nest egg to construction, which began in March, 1998 and was completed within budget in January 2000.

Happy ending
The final product of ten difficult years of effort by a variety of private and public entities is an attractive, award-winning, financially viable building. The original 1920s faÇade has been restored and now includes six 1,000 sq. ft. retail shops and 12 loft apartments with 24 parking spaces enclosed by the original walls. All six shops are rented and all 12 apartments are leased. It is estimated that the annual economic impact will result in annual sales of over $1 million, $16,000 in increased annual property taxes; $22,000 in annual utility sales, and nearly 20 jobs. The city will get back its $100,000 investment in four years and Lafayette Place has spurred at least five other major uptown rehabilitation projects, including one $5 million restoration.

In retrospect, Mason notes that cities should “consider every possibility before rushing to judgment and tearing a building down.”

Betsy Jackson, president of the International Downtown Association, which presented the project with an economic development award, cites the project as an example of the challenge and the beauty of such projects for small communities.

“The challenge is that small communities don’t have huge resources but the beauty is that you have a variety of players, all of whom have an interest in downtown but none of whom are being asked to carry it alone,” she says. “A project like Shelby’s allows so many varied interests and talents to make a difference without bankrupting any one of them.”

City Workshop on Economic Development...

City Workshop on Economic Development

The following is a copy of the email that I sent to all city employees about what to expect from the Financial Workshop.  To read all the reports and summaries of the first 5 Financial Workshops following the link at the top right titled “City Financial Study”

In the sixth workshop we will focus on the prospective revenue boost possible from economic development projects. Community Development staff have looked at active and anticipated development projects to derive estimates of likely one-time and recurring revenues. We will also try to provide some insight into the cost benefit ratio of different types of development. Lastly, we’ll try to compare city spending for economic development with our peer cities. A couple of our economic development partners, including DKC and KRBA, have also been invited to speak to Council regarding their role in attracting and expanding Kent businesses.

Part of what I will try to emphasize with City Council is that economic development sounds great because it potentially brings in new money, but in reality it is highly speculative (and volatile) so we have to be careful not to hang too much hope on economic development to dig us out of our financial hole. We may think we can get a whole bunch of new business to locate in Kent but those private investment decisions are nearly impossible to forecast with a high enough degree of confidence to actually build them into our budget. Assuming a new project will happen, even one that for all practical purposes seems certain, is still a roll of the dice and projects often get derailed for all kinds of business and personal reasons that we can never anticipate.

That being said, I think there’s plenty of room for the city to improve the odds for success in economic development. Economic development is a competitive industry. Kent competes with over 15,000 other cities for business attraction, retention, and growth. Kent doesn’t have the financial depth to compete head to head on tax incentives, nor do we have a lot of cheap, open land available for new development. In addition, much of the existing building inventory is outdated by current retail and manufacturing standards. But we do have a genuine historic downtown, a terrific river resource to build around, a half dozen successful (and loyal) international firms and most importantly we are home to the second largest state university in Ohio.

When you look at what has happened over the last 10 years to the city’s tax base, it is clear that the city has become increasingly reliant on revenues from the university. The university revenue contributions haven’t grown by leaps and bounds but they have increased by 1 to 1.5% per year at a time when many of our major manufacturers closed up shop or went south to Mexico. As a result, the relative influence of the university on our budget has grown, filling in the gaps left by our former large employers.

From a strategy perspective, it seems that the city’s increasing reliance on the university has happened by default rather than by choice. From my point of view we can’t afford to sit back in default mode any longer, we need to make a commitment to choose to build business activity around the university in order to leverage as much economic value as possible from this significant asset.

When I look at what other cities are doing in collaboration with their universities, I realize that we’ve barely scratched the surface for what’s possible here in Kent. A retiring University President summed up the situation best in the excerpt I’ve copied for you below that is entitled “Universities and Cities Need to Rethink Their Relationships.”

“The negative patterns of town-gown relations are no longer viable. The old impulses toward separation on one hand, or coercion on the other, must be set aside. Once, perhaps, universities could flourish by setting themselves apart from their communities. Over the last four decades, however, it has become evident that city-based universities ignore at their peril the well-being of their communities.

Recently cities have begun to realize that successful universities can promote economic, social, and cultural vitality. The report “Leveraging Colleges and Universities for Urban Economic Revitalization,” concluded that “leveraging academic assets … remains one of the greatest untapped urban revitalization opportunities in the country.”

Both universities and cities need to act on the basis of these new realities. Universities should move from merely coexisting with our communities, or reaching out to them only when we need something, to incorporating regional vitality into our planning for institutional growth. Civic leaders should think less about what they can extract from local universities and more about how they can help those institutions flourish.”

In preparation for tonight’s meeting I compiled numerous examples (Download the Articles) of how other cities that were also struggling economically built new economic strategies around their universities with great success.

(Other excellent summary reports include:  Universities as Economic Anchors and Leveraging Universities for Economic Gain).

The bottom line is this – we all know that having a university here in town is going to create some costs and extra work for us that other cities don’t have to deal with (at least not on the same scale). But likewise, having that university here in town has enormous economic upside if we get serious with our commitment to cultivate that asset – not for some civic good will but for our own economic self interest. That’s just good business sense and we’re too smart not to take advantage of what is sitting right in front of us.

This is our last scheduled informational workshop. We still have a few parking lot issues to try to cover but as we wrap them up next month we will then need to focus on developing our financial strategy. That’s where things get interesting.

Keeping Kids Safe...

Keeping Kids Safe

In the last 10 years there’s been new legislation passed that makes it possible for people to find out if there is a sex offender living in their neighborhood.  The sex offender registries list the names and addresses of people who have been convicted of a range of sexual misconduct and offenses.  The idea combines the “right to know” with the neighborhood watch concept to help keep kids (and adults) as safe as possible from sex crimes.  I’ve been asked about sex offenders in Kent and I decided to do a little research. Read on to see what I found.

For obvious reasons, the mere mention of sex offenders will get people’s attention in a hurry, so finding out that there’s one living down the block can be quite alarming.  Whether you have kids or not, this is a very troubling topic that can leave anyone feeling vulnerable for themselves and those they love.

The availability of the sex offender registries on the Internet (in Ohio) definitely raised the awareness of the general public to the problem.  And that’s a good thing.  We need to have access to that kind of information so that we can be smart, take precautions and be alert.  But it also seems that the registries can create a lot of fear which was certainly not the intention but has been an all too common reaction.  And I’m not sure fear is a good thing in this case.

[Click here to see What the Law Says]

Clearly, ignorance is not bliss when it comes to criminal presence, but based on some of the emotional reactions that result from discovering the criminal history of your neighbor I think it’s equally important to understand the big picture.  I’m no expert but I’m good about doing my homework and learning from the experts.  Here’s some of the important things that I learned that help frame the whole discussion of sex offenses.  These points may not alleviate all your concerns but I do think they help us understand the risk involved in a more meaningful way.

1.  Sex Offenders are All Around — just because the lists are now public and you’re able to know who has been convicted of sex offenses, doesn’t mean that you’re any more at risk than you were before the list.  The fact is 80% of us have a sex offender living within 1 mile of our home.  It’s that prevalent.  80% is a big number so it’s a mistake to think that one neighborhood is necessarily any worse than any other.  The research suggests that the problem crosses socio-economic borders.  It happens everywhere.

2.  The Offenders are Usually Family and Friends — it’s sad to say but the Justice Department reports that 90% of the offenders are friends or family of the victim.  Random strangers rarely commit these crimes.  So you or a family member are at a much greater risk from those close to you than from an unknown offender living somewhere in your neighborhood.

3. Kids Hurting Kids — I was surprised to see that over 50% of the juvenile offenses are kids hurting other kids.  So yes, tell your kids to be cautious of strangers, but don’t overlook what kids can do to other kids.

4. Repeat Offenses — The Justice Department reports that recidivism rates for sex offenders is below that for other crimes.  The data is not perfect but it seems to suggest that treatment can work for most offenders.
With some of that basic information in hand I wanted to better understand how prevalent sex offenders were in our community so I did some more searching and compiling of the data.  I came up with the following chart showing the number of registered offenders in Kent versus some of our regional peer cities.  The numbers I calculated come straight from the US Census Bureau population figures and the sex offender registries — all I did was divide the numbers.

In reviewing the regional numbers, Kent appears to be in lower tier of the chart, which is exactly where you’d want to be.  Still, it’s important to remember that this problem is everywhere so don’t feel too complacent with Kent’s relative ranking but likewise we can’t live our lives in fear and if these numbers help reduce that fear somewhat then that’s a good thing.

Jammin’ on the Dam...

Jammin’ on the Dam

Months ago I was quoted in the newspaper wishing Kent had its own version of Cuyahoga Falls’ “Rockin’ on the River” and I even went so far as to suggest calling it “Jammin’ on the Dam.”  Thanks to my position as City Manager, my ideas often make it in the newspaper but I generally don’t get too much feedback on them (which is usuallly a good thing) but that was not the case with the Jammin’ on the Dam remark.  That one sentence led more people to pull me aside than any other issue I’ve ever raised.  People cheered me on and wanted to know how they could help.  I was surprised and intrigued.

To be honest, at that point I had not had a chance to actually attend a Rockin’ on the River event (I’d only heard about it through word of mouth) and the whole Jammin’ on the Dam name came from a city firefighter that had great memories of Kent’s musical legacy and told me to get busy recapturing Kent’s position as “THE” spot to go for live music.  I heard this same sentiment many times over wherever I went in Kent after that article was printed.

So in the spirit of making sacrifices for my job, I did my homework and went out in Kent’s downtown a couple of times to see what musical entertainment we had and compared that with my first actual visit to Cuyahoga Falls’ River event. I’m glad I had a chance to visit both because before I went to Rockin’ on the River the practical side of my brain was thinking that there was no need to reinvent the wheel, let’s just take their model and copy it.  But now that I’ve seen it firsthand I realize that we have a chance to offer something different that can be unmistakably Kent.

As much as I enjoyed the Rockin’ on the River venue, it became obvious to me that the scale was not Kent-like.  First off, Cuyahoga Falls is double the size of Kent and I’d guess that the success of the event through the years has caused it to grow bigger and bigger which is great for two reasons:  1) because we need places nearby that provide medium to large venues; and 2)it leaves the door open for more intimate venues to complement it – which is exactly Kent’s niche.

From the Kent Stage to Woodsy’s, Kent is all about  a very personalized music scene.  By contrast, the layout of the vending plaza and the location of the band (tucked out of site in a sunken bunker) at Rockin’ on the River left me feeling disconnected from the music but all too connected with the lines of people waiting along with me to buy some food.  Afterwords I realized that I never had a chance to get close enough to see the band and the design of the amphitheater seemed to not be great for accoustics.  And other than the advertised title, I never saw the river and it didn’t really seem to be all that relevant to the music or the event.

Don’t get me wrong, we had a lot of fun. I’m thrilled to have Rockin’ on the River so close by and we’d definitely go back.  My kids played in the fountains, we strolled, ate, drank and were generally quite merry.  I guess I was also encouraged because from all the hype I couldn’t imagine ever competing with the Rockin’ on the River event.  And now I realize we don’t have to compete, we can complement.  We will not beat Cuyahoga Falls at it’s own game, but we can offer an alternative music scene in Kent that is more personal and intimate. Kent seems all about being alternative so once again, I think we’ve got a potentially great fit, with a great start downtown; at this point it’s just a matter of doing it right.

Kent has a more intimate sensibility to it with it’s existing music venues being smaller with a more laid-back groove.  Kent’s river plays a very real role with the landmark Dam.  Put all this together and I think we could do something special that is true blue Kent. I’m not sure how all the pieces will need to be arranged but I’m hoping we can start experimenting with some different uses in and around the Dam to figure it out.

To me, Kent’s music scene can be more of a genuine music experience, with food vending second.  Too often at large venues I have a sense that they are so commercialized that it feels like a vending experience with the music secondary.  Again, it’s that Kent experience that separates us from so many of our neighbors.  In a round-about way, our lack of flagrant commercial success distinguishes us and while we need to leverage some more commercial activity out of what we’ve got, it will be important to not do it at the expense of the Kent heritage.

You can join in the action — maybe not on the Dam but not far from it, on Friday June 30th in downtown Kent starting at 5pm.  That night the Standing Rock Cultural Arts Gallery and the Downtown Innovative Community Events (DICE) are sponsoring “Festive Friday” at the Home Savings Plaza which will include live music followed by an outdoor movie.  The June 30th movie is scheduled to start at 9 pm and will feature “The Princess Bride.”  The Plaza is small enough to actually see and here the music so don’t miss it.

Of course economics is part of the equation but I consider it a by-product not the product.  If you have doubts about the power of music on the economy read the Role of Music in the Austin Economy Report or check out this Link to the Arts and Economic Development Report .

The data speaks for itself.

More Middlebury Road Bridge Discussion...

More Middlebury Road Bridge Discussion

As we continue to work with CSX to finalize a settlement on the lawsuit that would allow the city to install the new bridge, I’ve received a couple of notes from concerned residents about the prospect of increased traffic on Middlebury Road once the bridge is replaced.  Obviously while the bridge has been out of service the traffic has been quiet but when the bridge is replaced it will definitely resume and I can understand the concerns of residents that live along Middlebury Road.

As a former Transportation Director I am all too familiar with the tension that occurs along roads that have residential properties but serve as collector streets.  Middlebury Road is a great example of this dilemma.  (For more information on street classification click here).

Even in the world of traffic calming, where efforts are made to better protect residential neighborhoods, most communities limit traffic calming measures to streets that carry less than 4,000 vehicles per day.  Middlebury Road carries 5,000 vehicles per day which puts it very clearly in the role of a collector street, which means it was designed to move traffic.  Now that’s hard to hear of you live on a street like that but it’s an important piece of information when it comes to considering the overall problem.

I’ve yet to find an easy fix for this dilemma but Gene Roberts, Kent’s Service Director, offers an excellent summary specific to Middlebury Road.

First, a resident’s concern:
I have recently read about the developments on the Middlebury Rd. bridge project and would like to express my thoughts as a resident of Middlebury Rd.

First, not everyone is upset that the bridge is closed. I realize that a new bridge is inevitable, but I would implore you to reconsider what type of bridge is to be put in on Middlebury Rd. is not a thoroughfare, nor should it be considered a “feeder” road into Kent. That’s the purpose of St. Rt. 59, 261 Bypass, and St. Rt. 43. According to the Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study, 2,760 cars currently use the Middlebury Rd. daily (a 30% reduction) and that’s without the bridge! What will become of Middlebury Rd. if you continue your current course of action to put in a two-lane, truck-rated bridge? I cringe to think how much more traffic will barrel down our residential street speeding, running stop signs and ruining the road in the name of shaving off a few minutes. Since the bridge will eventually be put in, I would suggest it remain a one-lane bridge that allows only car traffic. This would be a viable solution for the residents. First, it would appease those folks who want to see the bridge re-opened and secondly, it would keep big trucks off our residential streets. This appears to be a win-win solution, without adding undue financial burden or stress on the residents who have to live along Middlebury.

Secondly, I found it interesting that City Council is looking into a city-wide trash pickup service since they feel there is too much truck traffic on residential streets. Yet, this same Council is not worried about truck traffic on Middlebury Rd ? Clearly, this is a conflict. How can you state that you are worried about truck traffic on residential streets, yet totally ignore those same needs of Middlebury Rd? In a recent Akron Beacon Journal article, a council person said, “How do you make the railroad see that they’re not being good neighbors?” My question to those addressed above is: How are you being good neighbors by insisting on replacing the one-lane bridge with a two-lane, truck-rated bridge? If your concern about truck traffic on residential streets is genuine, it will also be a genuine concern for Middlebury Rd. residents. Posting “No Trucks” signs would be a farce, kind of like the “optional” stop sign at Janet Drive and Middlebury. We need real solutions that will work long-term.

I thank you for your time and would appreciate any feedback Council or city government officials could offer on this problem. Please consider the best options for ALL of Kent‘s residents.

Second, Gene’s Reply:
Thank you for your email of June 12, 2006. The Middlebury Road Bridge over the CSXT railroad tracks has caused a great deal of concern for most if not all of the residents in your neighborhood and additionally I have heard from those from outside of your neighborhood.

Your concern regarding increased traffic when the bridge opens is understandable. The traffic that is anticipated to return on I worked on this project starting in July 2003 and I have reviewed the information assembled prior to my involvement. I found where you expressed your concern regarding the one-lane bridge replacement as a two-lane bridge during the public meetings held prior to the new bridge design. The results of the resident concerns were presented at a meeting of Kent City Council. In considering this matter I believe Council took into account the information gathered by City staff as well as information received directly by Council members during discussion with individual residents. It is reported that most of the residents that talked with Council members directly were in favor of the bridge at a ratio of 9 to 1.

Reviewing the Council meeting minutes I believe your general increased traffic and specifically the additional truck traffic concerns were heard by council. The motion to proceed with construction of a two-lane bridge also includes instructions to staff to sign the bridge to allow for local truck traffic only and to include traffic calming on Middlebury Road as part of the project.

Middlebury Road has been a “thoroughfare” for a couple centuries. Middlebury was given its name because the road ran from Kent (then Franklin Village) to the village of Middlebury that is located at the current site of the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company in Akron. In reviewing old documents I believe the roadway in Akron named Goodyear Boulevard Kent. The reason I provide you with the history of Middlebury is to explain that Middlebury was truly a major thoroughfare that overtime was down graded by the later construction of SR261.

Your reference to AMATS regarding the current traffic counts (with the bridge closed) is accurate. However, I must also point out the AMATS recognizes Middlebury Road as Minor Arterial street. The designation of a Minor Arterial does provide the City with the ability in the future to request and if available receive funding for future repair of the bridge. Additionally the fact that Middlebury Road is designated as a Minor Arterial also requires that the City build the new bridge to current design standards in order to be eligible for any future funding. The current design standards for a bridge on a Minor Arterial are a minimum of two lanes.

Please do not miss understand me in anyway as saying the City does not care about the residents living near or on Middlebury Road. Kent City Council has given clear direction to minimize the impact of the new bridge and the Engineering Division is currently following that direction. Engineering is looking at ways to place traffic calming along Middlebury Road to slow traffic. The new bridge will be signed allowing only local truck traffic.

I know that this response is not what you were hoping for in the form of a one-lane bridge but equally I want to say that the City is committed to do all with in its power to minimize the new two-lane bridge impact on the Middlebury Road residents.

Mountain Bike Mania...

Mountain Bike Mania

So far in my blog I’ve worked hard to be objective and not allow too many personal prejudices bias my view on the Kent360 perspective.   But today, that’s going out the window.  Today I’m climbing on my soapbox and shamelessly promoting mountain biking.  I’ll try to argue that it’s one of the nation’s fastest growing sports so it’s a great economic development opportunity.  I’ll argue university cities always have great bike shops and plenty of trails nearby which is good for university enrollment and good for city retail.

I’ll argue that mountain bike riders are actually successful, type A personality types, who continually push their capabilities and take risks, and when they take their helmets off we call those people entrepreneurs — which we need more of.  I’ll argue that mountain bikers are practicing environmentalists who appreciate natural resources and are committed to volunteering their time to protect and preserve it.

I’ll argue that mountain bikers travel in packs and spread the word about trails in guerilla marketing style creating great buzz which is what I call promoting eco-toursim.  I’ll argue that mountain bikes are not cheap and riders spend serious cash on their gear, food, gas, maps, etc. to do what they love and that means more dollars in our local economy.  I’ll argue those things and more but in the spirit of full disclosure I admit that I can’t be very objective on this one, I’m a bike-aholic.

I didn’t grow up bouncing off railings and benches riding those trick class BMX bikes.  Sure, I had the typical banana seat Schwin bike as a kid that I rode around the neighborhood and that evolved into a series of ten speeds but trail riding was never in the mix.  We moved to Washington DC and I did some road biking and paved trails, but again, I still hadn’t tapped into any off road trail stuff.  Then we moved to Tennessee and I figured when in Rome, be like the Romans — and that mean’t riding through the peaks and hollows of northeast Tennesse, southwest Virginia and western Carolina.  Being a novice I had no idea that this part of the country was considered by many to be mountain bike heaven but I soon discovered that on my own.

After the first heart rate busting climb and white knucled heart racing descent I was hooked.  As a newcomer I stayed away from the real technical stuff, e.g., log rolls, rock jumps, because I found out quickly (and painfully) that there’s more to this sport than a good set of lungs; it takes great skill and frankly courage to take these bikes where they go.  But the connection between man, bike, trail and nature was unbeatable, and to be honest it’s the only place I can go to clear my mind from all the troubles of a city manager because I learned the hard way that if you’re not focused on the task at hand in the woods, mother nature (as beautiful as she is) can be merciless and I’ve left shreds of body parts along trails all over northeast Tennessee (including a piece of my eye, nasty stuff that gives a whole new meaning to being one with nature).

Being late to this sport (I was 35 when I started) I’m still shaky on a lot of the technical trails but I’m still out there as often as I can learning how to safely traverse swithcbacks, roots, creek crossings and rock ledges.  Besides a great workout I find that a lot of solutions to my work problems reveal themselves while my mind is focused elsewhere and trail metaphors abound, e.g., don’t let your wheels get stuck in ruts, don’t overgrip the handlebars, stand more than you sit, and don’t get distracted by the flies, that help me see what I need to do at work.

When we moved to northeast Ohio I was worried about finding comparable trails but I’ve been pleasantly surprised.  The hill climbs are not as high and the downhill sections don’t last as long but the natural beauty and technical challenges stand up to anything I’ve been on.  The Cleveland Area Mountain Bike Association has done a great job in our region.  They’re actually a group that doesn’t just talk about regionalism they practice it. CAMBA advocates, builds and maintains trails as far south as Portage County.  They’ve partnered with State Parks folks to create sustainable trails that are enjoyed by all levels of riders.  West Branch State Park has really great trails and if you can’t reach me in the office you’ll probably find me banging around the trails and practicing my own version of tree hugging.

So what does all this have to do with Kent?  A lot more than meets the eye.
Kent’s economy is in transition.  We’ve lost a lot of our old manufacturing base and by default  we’ve become increasingly reliant on Kent State University as our economic benefactor.  That’s fine but I think it’s time we shift from a passive strategy of default to an aggressive strategy by choice to leverage the full economic potential of the university for community (and university) gain.  To me that subtle difference means finding those business niches that thrive around large universities and going after them at full speed.

Outdoor activities, like mountain biking or kayaking, are great opportunities to grow the small business base which is so important to Kent’s hometown charm and market profile.  We’re not a big box retail Stow look a like, we’re more “small business-ish” and many of the stores and support services for these outdoor activities are small business establishments that can compete in specialized markets that businesses like WalMart have not chosen to get into.  A good example of this is Century Cycles which has small successful bike shops in Solon, Medina and Peninsula.  We need one in Kent and we could probably get one if we did a better job cultivating our local bike scene.

Consider a few statistics:
60% of the general population participates in outdoor activities, like biking, hiking and kayaking.
Nearly half (45%) consider themselves avid enthusiasts.
Enthusiasts spend more money at specialty outdoor stores than in any other retail stores
The average age of participants is 39 but all age groups are represented.
Participants have a higher household income than the general population.
64% are college graduates.
Bicycling is the most participated in sport.
Participants spend an average of $780 on gear for their sport.
25% took a sports travel trip last year.
In last 5 years sports related travel is up 14%.
Participation in single track Mountain Biking is up 113% over last 5 years.
[read the full report]

In addition to the potential economic value, consider that Kent’s natural resources, e.g., the river, the bog, and it’s trail network linking to regional resources, e.g., Cuyahoga Valley, State Parks, are consistently rated at the top of the region’s assets.  So the availability of outdoor resouces is a highly valued quality of life component to Kent’s residents.

Sports and eco-tourism holds great promise to bring new dollars into the Kent economy, we just have to figure out how to capture it.  Every university city I’ve been in has had a couple of bike stores and trails nearby to choose from.  The University of Virginia and East Tennessee State had their own trails on university grounds that were open to the public and were quite challenging.  I’ve mentioned this to Kent State informally but I’d like to pursue it more actively in the year to come.  And not just because I love it, I actually think it has genuine economic and quality of life benefits for Kent.

« Previous Entries